|
The FOI
bill
By Editorial Board,
The Punch: Monday, 20 November 2006
More than two years after the House of Representatives passed the Freedom
of Information bill, the Senate, last Wednesday, passed the
bill that has been before the National Assembly since 1999.
The bill, sponsored by a group of civil society
organisations, seeks public access to information of public
interest as well as the protection of personal privacy. It
provides for the protection of serving public officers from
punishment for disclosing official information without
authorisation and stipulates the processes for obtaining
public sector information.
Many laws exist, that
restrict public access to official information. They include
the official Secrets Act, Federal Commissions (Privileges
and Immunities) Act, Evidence Act, and the Statistics Act,
to mention but a few. Even when the FOI bill becomes law,
reports said information on such areas as defense,
international affairs, law enforcement investigations, trade
secrets, technical and scientific information of economic
value, personal information, third party information, etc.,
may still be restricted. But by and large, the passage of
the FOI bill promises a severe blow on the face of official
secrecy, which many believe has made corruption to grow in
leaps and bounds over the years.
When signed to law,
Nigerians can approach any government establishment and
request for information on the activities of any arm or
agency of government without any explanation on why they
seek the information. Though there are provisions in the
bill that permit a public official to decline releasing
certain information, such official can only withhold such
information based on concrete reason. If not satisfied with
the reason for which the information is withheld, the
official can be dragged to court and if convicted, risks a
three-year jail term. Reports said the bill is waiting for
harmonisation by the Joint Committee of the National
Assembly before being sent to the President for his assent.
Presidential assent to the bill is expected within 30 days.
The ball is now in the courts of the Joint Committee of the
National Assembly and President Olusegun Obasanjo.
On assuming office in 1999,
President Olusegun Obasanjo fingered corruption as Nigeria’s
greatest problem. He promised that all rules and regulations
meant to bring about honesty and transparency in government
would be restored and enforced. The civil society, on its
part, felt that fighting the corruption monster required a
frontal attack on the secret conduct of government affairs.
The result was the draft of the FOI.
Virtually all public
information in the country is considered as “classified.”
Government agencies hide information from one another, using
official secrecy laws as a veil. Worse hit are journalists
and civil society organisations that are routinely denied
access to official information of public interest. It is
worse when officials are implicated in corrupt acts.
The passage of the FOI bill
is a victory for all patriotic Nigerians craving for
transparency and accountability in governance. The law would
not serve the interests of journalists and civil society
groups alone. It is a piece of legislation every citizen
should rely upon in holding government and the bureaucracy
at all levels accountable to the people.
Corruption has largely been
blamed for the over $400 billion which successive
governments squandered in the country in the past four
decades, without improving the economy, living standards and
public infrastructure. The expected FOI law may, however,
not make the desired impact if such laws as cited above,
that restrict access to public information, are still in
place, and if the National Assembly fails to enact the
enabling law that can make the asset declaration forms of
public officers accessible to the public. In addition, the
FOI law will be impotent if Nigerians are cowardly by not
insisting on their rights to know.
President Obasanjo’s quick
assent to the bill would go a long way in demonstrating his
belief in fighting corruption and bad governance with the
law.
|